14 Aug 2018
So far, 2018 has been a difficult year for emerging market (EM) assets, which in the last few months have fared significantly worse than their counterparts in developed markets. This has been due mainly to worldwide issues but also country-specific political uncertainty. Many investors are now asking if the sell-off presents a buying opportunity – or are there reasons to remain wary?
Seeking to answer this question, several of Aberdeen Standard Investments’ senior money managers, strategists and economists gathered to share views on EMs – the risks and also the opportunities. We were joined by special guest speaker, Sir Douglas Flint, former Chairman of HSBC and now the Chancellor’s City Envoy to China’s Belt and Road Initiative, who shared some unique insights.
As a starting point for the discussion, we carried out a poll of attendees, which revealed:
The views on equities versus bonds and geographic preferences were interesting. In the Forum, we examined the arguments put forward.
There have been both country-specific drivers, and worldwide drivers, of the recent EM sell-off.
Country-specific issues include increased political uncertainty, as in Brazil and Mexico. Elsewhere, there have been doubts raised about central banks’ independence from government, for example in Turkey, Argentina and Hungary. Some of these country-specific drivers are now starting to reverse.
Of greater importance has been the pressure across the EM complex from three external factors.
EMs markets are affected to different extents by world events, depending on their strengths and vulnerabilities. We analysed the vulnerabilities and imbalances that could potentially trigger a crisis. Our work revealed that there are significant pockets of risk in Latam (e.g. over-reliance on commodity exports) and emerging Europe (e.g. slowing trade flows) while emerging Asia does not appear to be especially risky.
Importantly, we note that, although EM fundamentals have weakened slightly over the past year, they remain healthier than during previous EM crisis episodes.
Following the market correction in 2015, there has been a cyclical recovery in EMs outside China. Low interest rates and improving global trade have helped boost domestic growth, a trend reflected in improving company earnings. Moreover, while initially confined to technology and commodities, this improvement has recently broadened to include other domestically-focused companies.
Looking at individual asset classes, EM equities look well-supported from a bottom-up, company-level perspective. In terms of valuation, EM equities are cheap relative to the US, although not compared to Europe or to their historic levels.
Upcoming elections in a number of EMs are likely to cause volatility. Moreover, those countries that are more heavily indebted are exposed: as central banks start withdrawing monetary support, the cost of borrowing will increase, putting the brakes on economic growth. China’s sound economic health gives it much flexibility and freedom in managing the economy. Nevertheless, given China’s close trading links with its more economically vulnerable neighbours, it is unlikely Chinese policymakers can manage these potential risks without some impact on China itself. The environment is becoming increasingly hostile, as protectionism and rising energy prices threaten to undermine potential growth in EMs. Additionally, the supply-driven rise in oil prices is negative for EMs in general. Overall, the risks for EMs are perceived to be mounting, although there are opportunities as a result of mispricing.
Our funds are currently overweight Latam, where we believe share prices more than compensate for the risks. We have neutral fund positioning in Asia and China.
The financial position of many EM countries has greatly improved since 2013. Among EM fixed-income assets, government bond valuations remain favourable compared with US investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds. Of those, US$-denominated EM government bonds look expensive relative to history, but with limited new issuance this year, the backdrop should remain supportive. Local-currency EM government bonds offer attractive real yields (‘real’ meaning taking account of inflation, which is low in most EMs), and EM currencies are undervalued. EM corporate bonds should provide defensive qualities, as rising interest rates pose less of a threat to this asset class, and credit quality is relatively high.
EM risks are increasing, but so too is the opportunity set for investors. One area of particular interest is China’s Belt and Road initiative.
China’s huge, multi-year BRI aims to pave the way for trade between China and other parts of the world via land and sea routes. 120 countries have signed up to the US$900 billion project, among them many Asian and Eastern European nations eagerly seeking infrastructure-driven economic growth. By exercising a form of ‘soft power’ in creating this free trade area, China aims to decrease the environmental impact of other EMs, and to decrease forced migration by promoting prosperity. Even if only small sections of the plan reach fruition, BRI could promote connectivity between markets, economic growth and shared wealth for those involved. For countries that are not natural allies of China, BRI might also be construed as a security threat. Indeed, the US has been extending financial support to South American countries (that are BRI signatories) via North American institutions.
China hopes the stock and bond market connections that have been built will create an increasingly active capital market that can be used to fund investment. The difficulty with raising international funding is, and will continue to be, credit quality and governance standards. China recognises this and is working to develop governance and standards frameworks. Sceptics express concern over such issues as inclusion of non-Chinese firms, governance and funding, and point to the fact that there has been very little investment so far, compared with the size of the proposed project.
From his discussions with Asian counterparts, Sir Douglas says the risks are viewed as being predominantly geopolitical in nature. China is heavily dependent on the US for trade, particularly IT, and will endeavour to develop its own IT intellectual property from which revenue growth will flow. Over time, China will increasingly seek to supplant the US within international bodies, to increase its power. Concurrently, its currency will become freely tradeable. Outside of geopolitical risks, Chinese government officials understand the challenge of raising funds for the project and are exploring ways to deal with it. They also recognise the problem of excess capacity in industries like steel, which is distorting world trade.
There are indisputable risks for EMs that could hamper further upside over the short term. However, over a longer timeframe, there are several favourable trends that offer significant opportunities for growing numbers of EM companies. Not all of these will be winners. Moreover, the sometimes relatively weak rule of law and geopolitical uncertainty in some EMs necessitates a highly selective approach to investing in both EM debt and equity. The value of careful, bottom-up research and analysis in picking the right investments cannot be overstated.
The value of investments, and the income from them, can go down as well as up and you may get back less than the amount invested.
Important Information
The value of investments, and the income from them, can go down as well as up and you may get back less than the amount invested. Past performance is not a guide to future results. Tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each investor and may be subject to change in the future. We recommend that you seek financial advice prior to making an investment decision.
Aberdeen Standard Investments is a brand of the investment businesses of Aberdeen Asset Management and Standard Life Investments.
The details contained in this marketing communication are for information purposes only and should not be considered as an offer, investment recommendation, or solicitation, to deal in any of the investments mentioned herein and does not constitute investment research. Aberdeen Standard Investments does not warrant the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of the information contained herein and expressly disclaims liability for errors or omissions in such information and materials.
Any research or analysis used in the preparation of the information has been procured by Aberdeen Standard Investments for its own use and may have been acted on for its own purpose. Some of the information may contain projections or other forward looking statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. These statements are only predictions, opinions or estimates made on a general basis and actual events or results may differ materially.
No information contained herein constitutes investment, tax, legal or any other advice, or an invitation to apply for securities in any jurisdiction where such an offer or invitation is unlawful, or in which the person making such an offer is not qualified to do so.
Third party websites provided by hyperlinks are completely beyond the control of Aberdeen Standard Investments. Accordingly, Aberdeen Standard Investments accept no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness and legality of the contents of such third party website, or for any offers, services and products contained therein.
Issued by:
Aberdeen Asset Managers Limited. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom. Registered Office: 10 Queens Terrace, Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire, AB10 1YG. Registered in Scotland No. SC108419.
Standard Life Investments Limited registered in Scotland (SC123321) at 1 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 2LL. Standard Life Investments Limited is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority.