08 Jun 2020
Andrew Ness, ASIP
Portfolio Manager
As China has started lifting lockdown restrictions, its economy is slowly getting back on track. Franklin Templeton Emerging Markets Equity’s Andrew Ness looks at the latest developments in Asia, and considers how some cash-rich companies in North Asia could prove survivors of the crisis.
Many investors think we could be on the cusp of a major global depression as a result of the coronavirus, but we don’t think that will happen. It’s been helpful to have our boots on the ground across mainland China and in Hong Kong so we can hear how our colleagues in the country and region have been dealing with getting back to normalcy, particularly those who had been in a government-enforced lockdown for much of the first quarter.
It’s too soon to describe what a broad economic recovery will look like, but we believe China and other trade-sensitive neighboring economies will have to be more reliant on domestic recoveries, given the short-term challenges they face with disrupted global trade routes.
Historically, many companies in China, Taiwan and South Korea that had large cash reserves attracted negative attention due to the potential impact such cash reserves could have on long-term profitability. While some cash reserves can be beneficial, having too much cash stockpiled rather than invested can mean it’s not being put to work to grow the business.
However, the massive piles of cash some companies today are sitting on could provide a vital buffer against the dour economic climate. Companies without such reserves, whether in Asia or the United States and United Kingdom, could suffer in comparison.
In our view, this helps us identify the survivors from this crisis—and potential winners from an investment standpoint. As you can see in the table below, the balance sheets of more companies in Asia are tilted toward cash than in the United States, United Kingdom or Germany.
Looking ahead, it raises bigger questions over characterizations of a developed economy—whether average wealth levels, or a country’s preparedness to protect its citizens in periods of crisis—should fall under the definition.
While the economic impact of the virus will weigh on many emerging market economies in the short term, the consumer trends we’ve been witnessing for some time are likely to remain relevant. Goods and services related to health and wellness were a fast-growing trend prior to the crisis, and we think this theme will remain broadly intact post-crisis—perhaps even moreso.
Additionally, there is strong demand for goods and services such as cars, high-speed broadband, life insurance and home ownership (and therefore, banking products like mortgages) in emerging markets, where penetration remains low. We don’t think the virus will ultimately change those wants and needs.
Middle-class and affluent consumers in Taiwan, China, India, Russia and Brazil, for example, should carry on trading up for higher-quality goods and services, as consumers in developed markets have done. To us as investors, those areas represent potential opportunities as we move past the current crisis period.
What Are the Risks?
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Stock prices fluctuate, sometimes rapidly and dramatically, due to factors affecting individual companies, particular industries or sectors, or general market conditions. Special risks are associated with foreign investing, including currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments; investments in emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors. To the extent a strategy focuses on particular countries, regions, industries, sectors or types of investment from time to time, it may be subject to greater risks of adverse developments in such areas of focus than a strategy that invests in a wider variety of countries, regions, industries, sectors or investments.